Jacob Fearnley vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Jul at 09:52 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Fearnley vs J. Pablo Ficovich

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ARG
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Fearnley 0 - 1 Ficovich
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jacob Fearnley winning 0 and Juan Pablo Ficovich winning 2. The last match between Juan Pablo Ficovich and Jacob Fearnley was at the National Bank Open - Toronto, 27-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Juan Pablo Ficovich getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fearnley | 0 |
| Ficovich | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) National Bank Open - Toronto(07-27-25)
J. Fearnley vs J. P. Ficovich H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $919,075 | Career Prize Money | $357,890 |
| 69.74% (106-46) | Career Total W/L | 55.99% (411-323) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 6 | Titles | 13 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 43.24% (16-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (3-3) |
J. Fearnley vs J. P. Ficovich Match Preview:
- Examine recent second serve performance. Fearnley has secured 44.4% of points with their second serve, while Ficovich slightly outshines them with 45.19%.
- Consider return game statistics. Fearnley edges out Ficovich by winning 47.62% of opponents' second serve points compared to Ficovich's 44.52%.
- Analyze first serve returns, where Ficovich has a slight advantage, securing 25.94% over Fearnley's 23.61%.
- Look at pressure handling: Fearnley has saved 53.65% of breakpoints, trailing just behind Ficovich, who has saved 53.92%.
- In overall performance, Fearnley shows a stronger form, winning 68.57% of matches over the past year, compared to Ficovich's 57.83%.
- Fearnley excels on I.hard courts with an 82% win rate, while Ficovich finds his success on clay at 59%.
- Note the experience levels. Fearnley has played tougher competition, facing opponents with an average rank of 163.1 versus Ficovich’s average opponent rank of 252.39.
- In deciding set scenarios, Fearnley has a significant advantage, winning 78% of such sets, whereas Ficovich has a 54% win rate.
- Recent breakpoint conversion shows Fearnley leading with 31.29% converted, compared to Ficovich’s 29.88%.
- Do return games provide any clues? Fearnley is slightly better at returning second serves, potentially giving them a tactical edge.
Editorial Prediction (July 27, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the match-up between Fearnley and Ficovich, several factors emerge that could heavily influence the outcome. Fearnley's superior performance record, especially in tougher match-ups, suggests he might have the upper hand. His ability to convert breakpoints and win decisive sets provides him with a notable advantage.
Fearnley's expertise on I.hard surfaces is another critical factor, given the surface on which the match will be played. Despite Ficovich's strengths on clay, the statistics show he may struggle against Fearnley’s aggressive playstyle on a faster court.
In summary, while Ficovich shows strong skills in pressure situations, Fearnley’s recent form and performance metrics suggest he is more likely to emerge victorious in this contest.
Jacob Fearnley vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Fearnley vs J. P. Ficovich H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:10:53 | Average Match Time | 1:10:53 |
| 55% (35/64) | 1st Serve % | 71% (27/38) |
| 57% (20/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 85% (23/27) |
| 52% (15/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 82% (9/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 16% (6/38) | Return Points Win % | 45% (29/64) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Fearnley Recent Matches Played
J. P. Ficovich Recent Matches Played

J. Fearnley vs J. P. Ficovich Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.74% (106/46) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.05% (412/323) |
| 64.12% (227/127) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.91% (933/766) |
| 55.26% (1828/1480) | Games Win/Loss | 51.95% (8363/7735) |
| 65.96% (31/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.04% (49/53) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.96% (352/245) |
| 77.61% (52/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29.63% (8/19) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 716 | Aces Total | 2160 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 668 | Total Double Faults | 1274 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:29:3 |
| 223.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 461.11 |
| 61% (5926/9698) | 1st Serve % | 62% (27138/43961) |
| 73% (4321/5926) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (18433/27138) |
| 50% (1880/3772) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8570/16823) |
| 45% (454/1018) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1908/4606) |
| 41% (4059/10005) | Return Points Win % | 40% (18136/44845) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Slam W/L | 37.50% (9/15) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Masters W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Main Tour W/L | 47.83% (11/12) |
| 79.59% (39/10) | Challenger W/L | 50.55% (183/179) |
| 81.82% (36/8) | Futures W/L | 64.38% (206/114) |
| 72% (100/139) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (406/726) |
| 50% (5/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 57% (23/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (103/215) |
| 75% (30/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (119/232) |
| 95% (91/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (412/347) |
| 4% (91/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (412/65) |
| 33% (61/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (322/62) |